Legal Opinion

Rodman v. Quick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1904PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. C. H. Donnelly, Judge, presiding. This is a bill filed by appellant, Martha A. Rodman, the legal owner and holder of a note secured by trust deed, to redeem from a prior mortgage made to Martha A. Quick, both upon the same farm located in Lake county, and which prior mortgage was foreclosed without appellant being made a party to the proceeding.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. C. H. Donnelly, Judge, presiding. This is a bill filed by appellant, Martha A. Rodman, the legal owner and holder of a note secured by trust deed, to redeem from a prior mortgage made to Martha A. Quick, both upon the same farm located in Lake county, and which prior mortgage was foreclosed without appellant being made a party to the proceeding. The Central Safety Deposit Company was also made a party defendant to the bill and filed a cross-bill, in which it prayed to redeem from the Quick mortgage. Other parties were made defendants to…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ricks

It would seem to be well settled that a foreclosure proceeding to which the mortgagor or person having an equity of redemption is not made a party is, as to such person, a mere nullity. (Bradley v. Snyder, 14 Ill. 263; Ohling v. Luitjens, 32 id. 23; Dunlap v. Wilson, 32 id. 517; Cutter v. Jones, 52 id. 84; Jeneson v. Jeneson, 66 id. 259; Rose v. Walk, 149 id. 60; Gage v. Brewster, 31 N. Y. 218; Vroom v. Ditmas, 4 Paige, 526; Gaskell v. Viquesney, 122 Ind. 244; 23 N. E. Rep. 791.) Appellant was not made a party to the foreclosure proceedings under the Quick mortgage, and the fact that Weddell,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  2. Hosford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Jackson ex. dem. Merrit v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Vroom v. DitmasNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  5. Chicago & Great Western Railroad Land Co. v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pelouze v. SlaughterIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Rogers v. BartonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Baldi v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Odell v. LevyIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Tinkoff v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API