Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 15, 2009No. 27485-3-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶1 Jack and Vernal Haynes and the Haynes’ daughter and son-in-law, Richard and Darleta Woodbury, appeal the trial court’s order enjoining their use of an easement road on the lands of Ronald and Anadee Snyder and Ronald’s brother and sister-in-law, Edward Snyder and B. Louise Snyder. The Hayneses and Woodburys mainly contend the trial court erred in not recognizing that unstated appurtenant road easement rights were transferred to the Hayneses by the Woodburys’ predecessors by means of a boundary line adjustment and quitclaim deed because the Woodburys’ larger parcel enjoyed an appurtenant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kucera v. State, Dept. of Transp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Northwest Properties Brokers Network, Inc. v. Early Dawn Estates Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Allyah Jasem Salim Ayesh v. Jonathan M. BullisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. City Of Puyallup v. Conway Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. In Re The Parentage Of C.j.m.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API