Seisinger v. Siebel
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this appeal, we determine the constitutionality of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2604(A) (Supp.2007) under the separation of powers clause of the Arizona Constitution. Section 12-2604 governs the qualifications necessary for expert witnesses in medical malpractice actions. Laura Seisinger (“Seisinger”) contends that § 12-2604(A) is unconstitutional because it violates the doctrine of separation of powers. She argues that § 12-2604(A) is in direct conflict with Rule 702 of the Arizona Rules of Evidence. For the following reasons, we hold…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Governale v. LiebermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009