Legal Opinion

Seisinger v. Siebel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 28, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 07-0266PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this appeal, we determine the constitutionality of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2604(A) (Supp.2007) under the separation of powers clause of the Arizona Constitution. Section 12-2604 governs the qualifications necessary for expert witnesses in medical malpractice actions. Laura Seisinger (“Seisinger”) contends that § 12-2604(A) is unconstitutional because it violates the doctrine of separation of powers. She argues that § 12-2604(A) is in direct conflict with Rule 702 of the Arizona Rules of Evidence. For the following reasons, we hold…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Governale v. LiebermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API