Legal Opinion
Mann v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 17, 2003No. 02-1355PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellants Billings and Cheryl Mann, husband and wife, appeal from a district court judgment which (i) dismissed their claim that Chase Manhattan Mortgage Company (“Chase”) violated the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, then (ii) denied their motions to amend the complaint. We affirm the district court judgment.
I
BACKGROUND
In 1998, the Manns and Chase entered into a $126,950 mortgage loan and related security agreement which conveyed a lien on the Manns’ principal residence. The security agreement provided, inter alia: “[Chase] may do and pay…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Soares v. Brockton Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Barbosa v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Grant v. News Group Boston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Ozie Bowen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. First Family Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Soto-Rios v. Banco Popular De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Silverstrand Investments v. Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Spookyworld, Inc. v. Town of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Padilla v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Jones v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.