United States v. Higerd
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMKEWICZ, Senior Judge:
Appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of three specifications of distribution of marijuana and one specification of dishonorable failure to pay a just debt, in violation of Articles 112a and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 934, respectively [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved his adjudged sentence to a badconduct discharge, confinement for two years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l. Before this court, appellant alleges several errors, none of which we determine…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. WaltersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. VanzandtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BrooksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. ThomasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993