Legal Opinion

United States v. Higerd

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 21, 1988No. ACMR 8702226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMKEWICZ, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of three specifications of distribution of marijuana and one specification of dishonorable failure to pay a just debt, in violation of Articles 112a and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 934, respectively [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved his adjudged sentence to a badconduct discharge, confinement for two years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l. Before this court, appellant alleges several errors, none of which we determine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. WaltersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. VanzandtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrooksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. ThomasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API