Legal Opinion
Sarah Dale v. Carolyn Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 2016No. 14-35583PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge LEAVY.
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Claimant Sarah E. Dale appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) found that, despite having severe impairments, Claimant is not disabled. The sole issue on appeal is whether the ALJ erred in according “limited weight” to the opinion of a nurse practitioner. We hold that the ALJ did err and, therefore, reverse and remand for further…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Gina Britton v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Bennett v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Billy Brown v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Brenda Diedrich v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Sutherland v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- (SS) (CONSENT) Facey v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.