Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 10, 2017No. Case No. 3:16-cv-00321-MAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Malcolm P. Marsh, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Suzanne E. Sutherland seeks judicial review of the partially favorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-403. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). For the reasons that follow, I reverse the Commissioner’s decision concerning Plaintiffs DIB application and remand for an immediate calculation and award of benefits.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
O…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jacobsen v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023