Paul v. Hodd

The jury found Gerald Plodd causally negligent as to the management and control of his automobile, and in failing to exercise the skill and judgment in its operation which he possessed. There is credible evidence which, when reasonably viewed, fairly admits an inference supporting the jury’s findings. That being true, neither the trial court nor this court has authority to change the jury’s findings. Auster v. Zaspel, 270 Wis. 368, 71 N. W. (2d) 417.

Appellants urge that the trial court erred in refusing to include in the verdict the appellants’ proposed question on assumption of risk by the…