Lueck v. City of Janesville

Although the defendants-respondents (city of Janesville and Sorenson) in their motions after verdict moved the court to change the verdict answer concerning Sorenson’s negligence from “yes” to “no,” and in their brief herein have made a passing reference to his negligence, the major thrust of both briefs is to the question of causation. The plaintiffs-appellants con tend that Sorenson’s negligence should be held to be a cause of the accident and injuries as a matter of law or, in the alternative, a new trial should be ordered in the interest of justice.

From our examination of the entire…