Legal Opinion

Cameron v. City

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1886No. 9147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

— This is an action for damages alleged to have accrued to plaintiff’s bakery by reason of sewage flowing upon the premises surrounding her house, and into the basement of the bakery.

The jury found a verdict for plaintiff, and assessed her damages at fifteen hundred dollars.

The appeal is from the judgment alone, and the case must be determined by the judgment roll.

The principal question that arises is, whether plaintiff’s cause of action is barred by subdivision 1 of section 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It cannot be gathered from the complaint when the injury sustained by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miles v. ThorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Ord v. De La GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wise v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Desmornes v. Herederos Desconocidos de DesmornesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907
  3. Guzmán v. VidalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1905
  4. Desmornes v. Unknown Heirs of Adolfo DesmornesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907
  5. Guzmán v. VidalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API