Hasshagen v. Hasshagen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This "action "was brought to declare an express trust in land. The court below found that the conveyance from the plaintiff’s intestate to the defendant “was made without consideration, and on the trust expressed and declared by said John, in writing, that he, .said -John, would hold the premises therein conveyed for and to the use of said ’Louis, and that said Louis might have the same back again, together with all rents issuing therefrom-,'whenever desired by him., said Louis.”
It is contended by the appellants that there was no evidence to support -this finding.
The contention of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Hellman v. McWilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Barr v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Donohoe v. Mariposa Land & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Smith v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Chamberlain v. ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Hardin v. HardinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Kinley v. ThelenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.