Legal Opinion

Tide Water Oil Co. v. Bean

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1938No. 12355PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY) Justice.

The purpose of the suit, as revealed by plaintiffs’ petition, was for the partition xof the entire ⅞ mineral, petroleum, etc., interest in, under and upon 8.69 acres of land situated in Rusk County, Texas. Plaintiffs, Angus Wynne a resident of Gregg County, Carlos Bean and wife Mary, residents of the State of Connecticut, alleged that they and the defendants, Tide Water Oil Company, an Oklahoma corporation, and Gordon R. Wynne, a resident of Van Zandt County, Texas, jointly owned the entire interest sought to be partitioned, alleging the fractional interest owned by each, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. De La Vega v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Holloway v. McIlhenny Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Henderson v. ChesleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lally v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Tide Water Oil Co. v. BeanTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tide Water Oil Co. v. BondTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  4. Tide Water Oil Co. v. BondTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Seeds v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API