Legal Opinion
State v. Pete
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 2013No. 2012-KA-0378PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge.
11 On March 4, 2004, the State charged Norman Pete with two counts of forcible rape, violations of La. R.S. 14:42.1, and one count of second degree kidnapping, a violation of La. R.S. 14:44.1. Pete pled not guilty at his arraignment on March 9, 2004. On April 21, 2004, the trial court found probable cause and denied Pete’s motion to suppress the identification.
On January 14, 2008, the trial court denied his motions to quash the bill of information. Pete pled guilty as charged pursuant to State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), reserving his right to appeal the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. BenjaminLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. JylesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. DominickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. NguyenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. EpperleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. FortenberryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Khanh H. NguyenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.