Legal Opinion

Port Of Astoria, Oregon v. Hodel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1979No. 76-1049PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

595 F.2d 467

12 ERC 2044, 9 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,252

PORT OF ASTORIA, OREGON, an Oregon Municipal Corporation,

Concerned Citizens of Clatsop County, an Unincorporated

Association, Dorothy Reikkola and Robert A. Fackler,

Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Appellees,

v.

Donald Paul HODEL, Administrator of the Bonneville Power

Administration, and Alumax Pacific Corporation, a

Delaware Corporation,

Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellants.

Nos. 75-3465, 75-3621, 75-3699 and 76-1049.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

March 5, 1979.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1979.

Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain (argued), Portland, Or.,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. State of California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Methow Valley Citizens Council v. Regional Forester, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Forelaws on Board v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API