Legal Opinion
Forelaws on Board v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1984No. 82-7319PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.
This is a challenge to the Bonneville Power Administration’s offers of long term contracts for power delivery pursuant to the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Regional Act), 16 U.S.C. § 839-839h (1982), without compliance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4361 (1976). We have previously held that this is a review of final agency action which, under the Regional Act, must be filed originally in this court rather than in the district court. Forelaws on Board v. Johnson, 709…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sierra Club v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Harriet F. Laflamme v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Joseph Keating , Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Sierra Club v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Public Utility Commissioner Of Oregon v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.