Ronald v. Pacific Traction Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered March 28, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $7,500, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a passenger in falling from a street car.
1Per curiam
— Respondent recovered a judgment against the appellant, as compensation for injuries she says she received in consequence of a fall from one of appellant Traction Company’s street cars. Although it is assigned that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict, a careful review of the testimony convinces us that, while in our judgment a verdict might well have been returned in favor of the appellants, yet there is a conflict of evidence, and the testimony offered on respondent’s behalf is sufficient, if believed by the jury, to sustain the verdict. In such cases we have uniformly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Clearwater v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1821
- Birkel v. ChandlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Harris v. Fidalgo Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jensen v. SchlenzWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Molitor v. Blackwell Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Bradley v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Lynch v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Dennis v. TrickWashington Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.