Legal Opinion

Birkel v. Chandler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1901No. 3927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Orange Jacobs, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

This action was brought by respondent to recover for loss of the services of his son, Clifford Birkel, a minor of the age of fourteen years, because of personal injuries received by said minor. On the 14th day of Hovember, 1898, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of Hew York was the owner of a building situated in the city of Seattle known as the “Mutual Life Building,” and had placed on and attached to said building a wooden beam, and to said beam a snail for the purpose of holding and fastening block and tackle to be used in carrying into…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Boor v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ford v. MonroeNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. State ex rel. Coughlan v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  5. George v. BelkTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Jensen v. SchlenzWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. J. E. Pinkham Lumber Co. v. Woodland State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lidfors v. PflaumOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Christianson v. Fayette R. Plumb, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API