Legal Opinion

Isensee Motors v. Rand

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1936No. 30,616PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a purported personal service of the summons with complaint attached and affidavit of no answer, judgment was entered May 10, 1930, in favor of plaintiff pursuant to findings of fact and conclusions of law made and filed upon due proof of the causes of action alleged in the complaint. In March, 1935, defendant moved to vacate the judgment on the ground that the summons had not been served. The motion was heard by Judge Cameron upon the files and records and affidavits produced and filed by the parties. On April 26, 1935, Judge Cameron filed an order denying the motion. There was no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baxter v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Voorhees v. Geiser-Hendryx Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hasara v. SwaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Wagner v. BroquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Berg v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Industrial Loan Thrift Corporation v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. High v. Supreme LodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Pilney v. FunkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API