Whack v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.
DNA is a powerful evidentiary tool and its importance in the courtroom cannot be overstated. See Maryland v. King, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1958, 1966, 186 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013) (observing that DNA technology is “one of the most significant scientific advancements of our era” and its usefulness in the criminal justice system is “undisputed”). DNA evidence can place a defendant at the scene of a crime, providing a firm scientific foundation for a prosecutor’s case, particularly when other evidence may be lacking. Not surprisingly, jurors place a great deal of trust in the accuracy and reliability of DNA…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen & Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Diggs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- People v. BondsteelColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. MosleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.