Legal Opinion

Whack v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 21, 2013No. 86PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.

DNA is a powerful evidentiary tool and its importance in the courtroom cannot be overstated. See Maryland v. King, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1958, 1966, 186 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013) (observing that DNA technology is “one of the most significant scientific advancements of our era” and its usefulness in the criminal justice system is “undisputed”). DNA evidence can place a defendant at the scene of a crime, providing a firm scientific foundation for a prosecutor’s case, particularly when other evidence may be lacking. Not surprisingly, jurors place a great deal of trust in the accuracy and reliability of DNA…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen & Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Diggs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. People v. BondsteelColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. MosleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API