Legal Opinion

Allen & Diggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 26, 2014No. 16/14PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

In this case, we address whether a criminal defendant may introduce at trial evidence of a DNA “match” to prove the identity of another individual without first establishing additional confirmatory testing pursuant to Md.Code (2003, 2011 Repl.Vol., 2014 Supp.), § 2-510 of the Public Safety Article (“PS”). PS § 2-510 provides that “[a] match obtained between an evidence sample and a data base entry may be used only as probable cause and is not admissible at trial unless confirmed by additional testing.” Based on the plain language of the statute, we answer the question posed in the negative.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. Richard StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Yagih AboumoussallemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bellard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Varriale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Fund for Animals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Leidig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Pickett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API