Legal Opinion

Stibbs v. Stibbs

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1950No. 31404PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an action for separate maintenance. The parties separated in February, 1948, and this suit was commenced the following October. The complaint was based, largely, upon the allegation that the defendant had become enamoured of a former employee, and that he devoted all his time and attention to her. The defendant denied this in his answer. At the trial, evidence was introduced by deposition and by direct testimony in support of both sides of this issue. Plaintiff’s chief witnesses were the former ém-ployee’s husband, Mr. Hill, and his sister and brother-in-law. Their testimony was that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AsparaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Nelson v. PlacanicaWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Libbee v. HandyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hardman Estate v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Ulbright v. HagemanWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bowker v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Stibbs v. StibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Alex and Katy Thomason v. Donna Stennes and Michael StennesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API