Legal Opinion

Samara v. Matar

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 2017No. B265752PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

—Rana Samara sued Dr. Haitham Matar and Dr. Stephen Nahigian for dental malpractice, alleging Dr. Nahigian had negligently performed oral surgery on her and Dr. Matar, as Dr. Nahigian’s principal and employer, was vicariously liable for Dr. Nahigian’s negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment for Dr. Nahigian on alternative grounds— Samara’s negligence claim was barred by the statute of limitations and Samara could not establish causation. We affirmed the judgment in favor of Dr. Nahigian based solely on the statute of limitations, expressly declining to reach…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Akhlaghpour v. OrantesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Harris v. Eslinger CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Holman v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API