Al De Ment Chevrolet Co. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice;
This is an action to recover damages by C. R. Wilson against the defendant partnership and the individual partners thereof, automobile dealers in the city of Birmingham, for negligently delivering to one Roberts, a prospective purchaser, an automobile with defective brakes, which negligence was counted on as the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries and damages, -resulting in -a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $2,000, from which judgment the defendants bring this appeal.
The proven facts on which recovery was rested are set forth in Counts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Saunders System Birmingham Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Vaughn v. Millington Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Holt v. Eastern Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Holt v. Eastern Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Motor Terminal & Transportation Co. v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aircraft Sales & Service, Inc. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Tierstein v. LichtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Eberhardt v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Penton v. FavorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Allen v. GenryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.