Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Millington Motor Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1929PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Anna Vaughn and her husband brought separate suits for damages against defendant Millington Motor Company. The consolidated causes are here upon appeal from a judgment of the trial judge sustaining the de fendants’ demurrers and dismissing the suits. The question presented by the appeal and assignments of error is whether or not the Millington Motor Company, a bailor for hire, is liable for injuries to Anna Yaughn, a third party, caused by defects in a truck, controlled: and operated by W. A. Sigler, the bailee.

It appears from the declarations setting forth plaintiffs’ statement of the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Coca Cola Bottling WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Burkett v. Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McGregor v. GillTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jump v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Mitchell v. LonerganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Gaidry Motors, Inc. v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  4. Jenkins v. SpitlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Kaplan v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API