Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Tomlinson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 25, 1961No. 21353PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIead, Presiding Justice.
1. Zoning regulations regularly enacted by a municipality pursuant to constitutional and legislative authority are valid and can not be held to be unconstitutional on the contention that constitutional authority to zone conflicts with other provisions of the Constitution, or upon the contention that rights guaranteed by the Constitution are denied as a result of the zoning regulations. Howden v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 172 Ga. 833, 843 (159 SE 401); Schofield v. Bishop, 192 Ga. 732 (16 SE2d 714).
2. The defendant’s plea of laches can not be sustained. No facts are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Snow v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Schofield v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Howden v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Sirota v. Kay Homes Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Chestatee Pyrites Co. v. Cavenders Creek Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matthews v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Massey v. Butts CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Head v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- City of Smyrna v. ParksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Rock v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.