Legal Opinion

Sirota v. Kay Homes Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1951No. 17451PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error, who were also plaintiffs in the trial court, had for some time before this litigation was instituted, owned and occupied as homes certain parcels of realty in the City of Atlanta which are separate parts of an area restrictively zoned for residential purposes by an ordinance of December 20, 1929. On the defendant’s application therefor, the Mayor and General Council of the City of Atlanta, on December 6, 1950, passed an ordinance rezoning a described vacant portion of the area here involved from residence to business uses. Alleging that the rezoning…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Thompson v. Eastern Air Lines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Barnes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Snow v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Leventhal v. SeiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Sikes v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Aladdin, Inc. v. KrasnoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Cadle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API