Legal Opinion

Union County v. Hoffman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1994No. 18296PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

Defendants Clarence and Wanda Hoffman and Siouxland Feeds, Inc., (Hoffman) 1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment declaring that Hofñnan’s operation of a mobile home trailer park constitutes a public nuisance and violates Union County (County) planning and zoning ordinances, and granting relief to County in the form of abatement of the nuisance. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1968, Hoffman purchased a tract of agricultural land located in Union County, South Dakota. The tract contained crop land, farm buildings, and a feed yard for horses, cattle and hogs. In that same year, Hoffman…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Langerman v. LangermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Selle v. PierceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Aberdeen v. WellmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hersrud v. HersrudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Atkinson v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Atkinson v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gleason v. PetersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API