United States v. Alexander
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WERNER, Judge:
The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of two specifications of indecent acts with a child under the age of sixteen years and one specification of indecent liberties with a child under the age of sixteen years in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], The convening authority approved the sen-fence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for ten years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. BankerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. LatimerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. PonderU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. BarriosU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BouknightU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. MilamU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991