Legal Opinion

United States v. Milam

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 6, 1991No. ACMR 9003301Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GRAVELLE, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted members of conspiracy to commit larceny, larceny, and receiving stolen property, in violation of Articles 81, 121, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 921, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to Prívate El.

The appellant assigns as error that:

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY DENYING A DEFENSE CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE [AGAINST] TWO ENLISTED…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. VolmarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. McNallyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. MasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. TagertU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API