Legal Opinion

Trantham v. State Disbursement Unit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2015No. Docket 322289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGadola, P.J.

Plaintiff, Jeffrey Trantham, individually and on behalf of other individuals similarly situated, filed an action in the Court of Claims against defendants, State Disbursement Unit (SDU), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and Office of Child Support (OCS), claiming that the $3.50 monthly charge collected by the Friend of the Court (FOC) from child and spousal support payments pursuant to MCL 600.2538(1) constitutes an unconstitutional taking and violates substantive due process. Plaintiff appeals as of right the May 30, 2014 opinion and order of the Court of Claims, granting…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. NW Pub. Serv. v. CITIES OF CHAMBERLAIN, ETC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. James P Page v. City of WyandotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API