Selvato v. Septa
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge
Plaintiff Marie Selvato brings this action against her former employer, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (‘SEPTA'), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. (‘Title VIP). Selvato claims that she was subjected to a hostile work environment and discriminated against on the basis of her gender. Before the Court is SEPTA’s Motion for Summary Judgment. SEPTA seeks judgment in its favor on all of Selva-to’s claims against it on the ground that there exist no issues of genuine material fact. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mahan v. City of Phila.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Danica Moore v. Philadelphia FIGHTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Ismail v. McDermott International Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- JENKINS v. SEPTADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- MCCRAY, III v. SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.