Legal Opinion
JENKINS v. SEPTA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 2021No. 2:19-cv-02180Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANGELIQUE JENKINS, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : v. : : SEPTA, : Defendant. : NO. 19-2180 MEMORANDUM Kenney, J. May 10, 2021 Plaintiff Angelique Jenkins (“Jenkins”) pro se brings this employment action against her former employer, Defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”). Jenkins alleges SEPTA retaliated against her and discriminated against her on the basis of her gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”). She also alleges…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.