Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bridwell v. Aderhold

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided December 19, 1935No. 1029, 1030PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNDERWOOD, District Judge.

Petitioners were defendants in the same indictment, the questions involved in their habeas corpus cases were the same, and they were heard together, though separate orders are entered in each case.

Upon the allowance of these writs and the appearance of petitioners, who were men of little education and without counsel or funds to procure same, the court suggested that, if petitioners desired, counsel would be appointed to represent them and aid the court in these proceedings, since the partial hearing then had disclosed that serious questions were involved and that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. In Re Shibuya JugiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Ex parte Chin Loy YouDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Victor Harry Feguer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. FergusonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. People ex rel. Moore v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. United States v. McGahaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API