Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to a judgment of the County Court of Mathews county, rendered November 18, 1898, on a prosecution of the plaintiff in error for unlawful fishing-—the plaintiff in error Laving been convicted and adjudged to pay a fine of $25, and the Circuit Court of said county having refused a writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, J.:

The plaintiff in error was indicted, tried and judgment rendered against him in the County Court of Mathews county for catching and taking fish in the waters of the Commonwealth without first having obtained a license and paid the tax required by Act of Assembly approved March 3» 1898. (Acts 1897'-’8, p. 864.) To that judgment this writ of error was awarded.

The County Court had jurisdiction to indict and try the plaintiff in-error for the alleged offence. • This was a prosecution for the violation of the revenue laws of the State, and by Act of Assembly approved February 9, 1898,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. People Ex Rel. Burrows v. Supervisors of Orange CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. IngallsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Binion, Sheriff v. Oklahoma Gas Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Bradley & Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  5. Newport News & Old Point Railway & Electric Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API