Ardila v. Saavedra

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Appellant, Marco A. Rubio-Ardila, brought suit against appellee, Antonio Saavedra, Jr., for damages arising from an automobile accident. Summary judgment was granted to appellee because the statute of limitations barred the appellant’s claim. By three points of error, appellant argues that summary judgment was improper because an issue of material fact exists whether limitations was tolled by appellee’s absence from the State. Appel-lee did not file a brief. We reverse the trial court’s judgment.

In support of his motion for summary judgment appellee relied upon…