Legal Opinion

Ray v. O'NEAL

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1996No. 2-95-213-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Sharon and Dorothy Ray appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment on their claim for personal injuries sustained' in an automobile accident with James M. O’Neal. In two points of error, the Rays argue that summary judgment was improper because fact issues exist concerning whether O’Neal was absent from Texas a sufficient length of time to toll the applicable statute of limitations, and whether the Rays exercised due diligence in attempting to obtain service of process on O’Neal. We sustain both points of error and reverse and remand the case for trial.

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Weaver v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
  2. Tranter v. Duemling, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  3. Mauricio v. Castro, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Howard v. Fiesta Texas Show Park, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Littleton v. Prange, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API