Legal Opinion

Ardila v. Saavedra

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 18, 1991No. 13-90-211-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

808 S.W.2d 645 (1991)

Marco A.R. ARDILA, Appellant,

v.

Antonio SAAVEDRA, Jr., Appellee.

No. 13-90-211-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

April 18, 1991.

Jamie Balli, Roger W. Hughes, Harlingen, for appellant.

Gilberto E. Rosas, Brownsville, for appellee.

Before DORSEY, KENNEDY, and BENAVIDES, JJ.

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Appellant, Marco A. Rubio-Ardila, brought suit against appellee, Antonio Saavedra, Jr., for damages arising from an automobile accident. Summary judgment was granted to appellee because the statute of limitations barred the appellant's claim. By three points of error,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Oram v. General American Oil Company of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Vaughn v. DeitzTexas Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API