Legal Opinion

Aull v. Cavalcade Pension Plan

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 31, 1997No. Civil Action 96-D-628PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE KMART DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DANIEL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on a Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment filed on July 18,1997, by Defendant Kmart Corporation and Defendant Kmart Corporation Employees’ Retirement Plan (the “Kmart Defendants” or “Kmart”), seeking summary judgment in their favor on the Fifth and Sixth Claims for Relief in Plaintiffs Complaint. The Court has reviewed the extensive briefing and the evidentiary exhibits submitted by the respective parties as well as the relevant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Gluck v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Kenneth W. Wright v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olivo v. ELKYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Patterson v. BP America Production Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ellis v. Rycenga Homes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. Moyle v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  5. Olivo v. ElkyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API