Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Merchants Mutual Insurance & Schmid

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1968PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William R. Brennan, Jr., J.

After a hearing, petitioner’s motion for a stay of arbitration is in all respects denied.

On December 20, 1965 claimant was a passenger in a vehicle owned by one Silkworth which was insured by petitioner (the policy containing the standard New York uninsured driver indorsement) when said vehicle was struck in the rear by an automobile owned by one John Miller and operated by one Walter Jaeger.

Petitioner claims that it never received timely notice of claim under the uninsured driver indorsement, and that, in any event, the claimant has not proven that the Miller…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Dowell v. Safe Auto Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Frunzar v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API