People v. Shippens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant seeks a review of the determination of the court which, on remittitur, denied his motion to suppress the identification testimony of the victim. The record supports the court’s determination. One-on-one showups which are proximate to the arrest in time and place are permissible in the interest of prompt identification, provided that they are conducted without undue suggestiveness by the police (People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1024; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241, 249; People v Brnja, 50 NY2d 366, 372; People v Johnson, 102 AD2d 616, 627; cf,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. LomackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. MinterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992