Legal Opinion

Chicoine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 3, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

In this action of tort or contract a demurrer to the declaration was sustained for failure to state a cause of action. The plaintiff appealed.

The lengthy declaration alleges the following: In a policy insuring the defendant Warren H. Greer the defendant insurer agreed to pay all sums, but not more than $26,336.10, which Greer should become obligated to pay for bodily injuries sustained by any one person as a result of Greer’s operation of a motor vehicle owned by Greer. On October 13, 1961, the plaintiff Chicoine, Jr., was injured by Greer’s negligent operation of his motor vehicle, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Moskow v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bean v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Poremba v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Bush v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1969
  4. Colsch v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Hyppolite ex rel. Hyppolite v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API