Legal Opinion
Poremba v. City of Springfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 5, 1968PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
The plaintiffs seek declaratory relief concerning a taking of land pursuant to a recorded order of the Springfield city council, approved by the mayor. The taking was for a proposed “outer belt highway.” It is alleged that the Porembas’ parcel (no. 13) “is totally unnecessary for and extraneous to the construction of” the highway; that parcel no. 12, belonging to Helen C. Riley, and parcel no. 10, belonging to Marjorie Dunning, a plaintiff, are both unnecessary for the construction; and that part of a parcel (no. 9) was unnecessarily taken from James A. and Bernice Bremner, other plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Moskow v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pheasant Ridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Bonan v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Penal Institutions Commissioner v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Hallenborg v. Town Clerk of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.