Legal Opinion

Colsch v. Travelers Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs (husband and wife) from an order of the judge sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ declaration in four counts. The plaintiffs alleged that an action was brought against them following a motor vehicle accident and that the defendant insurer acting “arbitrarily and in bad faith, breached its obligation ... to exercise good faith and diligence in protecting the . . . [plaintiffs’] interests by disregarding” an offer to settle the claim within the policy limits and thus subjecting the plaintiffs to a judgment in excess of the policy limits. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abrams v. Factory Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Murach v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. McAleenan v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Sterios v. Southern Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Chicoine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. New Hampshire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API