Legal Opinion

Pagarigan v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 2007No. B193114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILEY, J. *

The law required plaintiffs to amend their complaint within 30 days. They did not, and so the trial court dismissed their case. Plaintiffs tried, unsuccessfully, to set aside this dismissal. The trial court’s actions were valid. We affirm.

I

Plaintiffs are Teri, Mary, and John Pagarigan. They are Johnnie Pagarigan’s adult children. Johnnie Pagarigan suffered a stroke and entered the Magnolia Gardens nursing home in February 2000. She died in June 2000. Her adult children claim abuse and poor medical care caused her death.

The Pagarigans sued two groups. The first is the Aetna…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Generale Bank Nederland, N v. v. Eyes of Beholder Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Gotschall v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heritage Residential Care, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Dye v. Caterpillar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Rodriguez v. WNT, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Talbott v. GhadimiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API