Dye v. Caterpillar, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1369Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
Donald W. Dye and his wife, Valerie (hereafter the Dyes), allege that Donald suffered from silicosis and other pulmonary diseases as a result of exposure to silica in his use of defendants’ defective products.1 In a prior unpublished opinion on consolidated appeals (Dye v. Caterpillar (Nov. 17, 2008, A114948, All6022)), this court reversed orders sustaining demurrers, without leave to amend, to the Dyes’ third and fourth amended complaints. On remand, the Dyes filed a fifth amended complaint 108 days after the clerk of this court mailed notice of the issuance of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Phelps v. StostadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Katzenstein v. Chabad of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Blauser v. DubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Lee v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019