Legal Opinion

Capital Blue Cross v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1978No. Appeals, Nos. 1268, 1281 and 1323 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

These are petitions for review brought by Capital Blue Cross (Capital), Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania (Western), and Blue Cross of Lehigh Valley (Lehigh) from the Order and Adjudication of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Penn*586sylvania (Commissioner), William Gr. Sheppard, dated June 10, 1977, and docketed at Docket No. R77-1-2, in which the requested rate increases for an insurance plan, referred to as “65-Special” Agreements, were disapproved.

The “65-Special” Agreement, as approved by the Department of Insurance, provides coverage to subscribers…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Blumberg v. GreenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Pennsylvania Insurance Department v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nagle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Insurance CommissionerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Insurance CommissionerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API