Legal Opinion

People v. Solis

California Court of Appeal, 2nd District

Decided March 23, 2016No. B262149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavin, J.

*1103INTRODUCTION

Defendant Esmeralda Solis appeals from the denial of her petition for recall and resentencing under Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. Defendant argues Proposition 47, which reduced the penalty for theft of property worth less than $951 from a wobbler to a misdemeanor, applies to her felony conviction for taking or driving a vehicle under Vehicle Code section 10851, subdivision (a). We conclude defendant was not convicted of a qualifying theft offense and affirm the denial of her petition.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On March 15, 2012, defendant and three…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. CromerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Van OrdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. Van OrdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API