Legal Opinion

People v. Van Orden

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 2017No. E066432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1282Opinion

SLOUGH, J.

—Like People v. Garza (2005) 35 Cal.4th 866 [28 Cal.Rptr.3d 335, 111 P.3d 310] (Garza), this case “involves the interplay between two criminal law statutes: one a provision of the Penal Code, the other a provision of the Vehicle Code.” (Id. at p. 871.) In Garza, the court considered the interplay between Vehicle Code section 10851 (unlawful taking or driving a vehicle; hereafter section 10851) and Penal Code section 496 (receiving stolen property). This case involves the interplay between section 10851 and Penal Code section 490.2 (petty theft; hereafter section 490.2).

Defenda…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. JaramilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. GarzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. Gutierrez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. D.N. (In re D.N.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. In re D.N.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. People v. ChubbuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API