People v. Van Orden
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1282Opinion
SLOUGH, J.
—Like People v. Garza (2005) 35 Cal.4th 866 [28 Cal.Rptr.3d 335, 111 P.3d 310] (Garza), this case “involves the interplay between two criminal law statutes: one a provision of the Penal Code, the other a provision of the Vehicle Code.” (Id. at p. 871.) In Garza, the court considered the interplay between Vehicle Code section 10851 (unlawful taking or driving a vehicle; hereafter section 10851) and Penal Code section 496 (receiving stolen property). This case involves the interplay between section 10851 and Penal Code section 490.2 (petty theft; hereafter section 490.2).
Defenda…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. JaramilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. GarzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. Gutierrez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. D.N. (In re D.N.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re D.N.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. ChubbuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.