Legal Opinion
Goodwin v. Grosse
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1922No. Civ. No. 3464PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff had judgment in an action for unlawful detainer, from which defendant has appealed.
It appears that plaintiff by a written lease let and demised to defendant certain premises consisting of two storerooms, one of which is designated as 66 North Broadway, in Pasadena, for. a term of one year from October 31, 1919. This lease contained a provision as follows:
“It is understood and agreed that the party of the second part (the lessee) shall not assign or transfer this lease, nor sublet any portion of the premises without the written consent of the party of the first part; and furthermore…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Randol v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Shaw v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Spangler v. SpanglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crowell v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Kendis v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Investors' Guaranty Corp. v. ThomsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Weisman v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.