Legal Opinion

Spangler v. Spangler

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1909No. Civ. No. 660PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County denying a new trial. John E. Richards, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in an action under section 1161, Code of Civil Procedure, to recover the possession of certain orchard land in Santa Clara county.

The defendant went into possession under a written lease-from his mother, the plaintiff, to himself and to his sister, Annie Leal. The term was for five years, to commence November 1, 1902!, with the privilege of an additional five years, provided that the lessees elected to avail themselves of the privilege prior to July 1, 1907. The rent reserved was $600 per annum, payable annually on the first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randol v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Randol v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Schluter v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hancock Oil Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Cities Service Oil Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Miller v. ReidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API